Home
2008:
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
2007:
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2006:
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2005:
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2004:
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2003:
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2002:
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2001:
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2000:
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December

(keitai-l) Re: The first FOMA T bluetooth mobiles arrive

From: Joseph Luk <joespam_keitai-l_at_choberi.com>
Date: 06/05/04
Message-Id: <2C10EBDE-B67D-11D8-802E-000A95CCB7D2_at_choberi.com>
On Jun 4, 2004, at 7:42 PM, Benjamin Joffe wrote:

> Start a communication campaign about "your mobile damages your brain"
> (or "damages your skin" may be even more efficient)
> and you may see makers include bluetooth and people buy headsets...

Oh, so is Bluetooth radiation healthier than mobile phone radiation 
now?  Have there been any studies, or different SAR standards, etc. to 
support this claim?

Or are you saying that just based on lower power ratings?

Bluetooth = 1-100mW _at_ 2.4GHz  (typ. 2.5mW for power class 2)
WCDMA Mobiles = 21-33 dBm = 125-1990mW _at_ 2GHz

But they are at different frequencies and duty cycles.  Has anyone done 
SAR comparisons between Bluetooth and mobiles?

Still, though, it's a hard sell, just based on "less of the 
(potentially) dangerous stuff."  Then again Coke C2 is debuting in 
Japan, so let's see how that goes.  =)

Cheers,
Joseph Luk
Received on Sat Jun 5 02:16:21 2004