(keitai-l) Re: rock/unrock

From: Arnold P. Siboro <asiboro_at_maltech.jp>
Date: 05/28/05
Message-Id: <20050528215151.F0C6.ASIBORO@maltech.jp>
As I previously mentioned, NK702 is not 702NK. 
NK702 is known to be un*ockable, while 702NK is not.

On Fri, 27 May 2005 20:39:40 +0900
nick may <nick@kyushu.com> wrote:

> I am sufficiently cautious of the service such companies offer to post 
> the URL below in non-google-friendly form.... (I got it off a google ad 
> on The Reg.)
> 
> www dot freeyourphones dot com
> 
> I note the NK702 (702NK I assume...) is referred to in the pulldown, as 
> is VodaJP...
> 
> Has anyone tried this? Did it work? How unrockable is the 702NK?
> 
> Nick
> 
> 
> This mail was sent to address asiboro@maltech.ne.jp
> Need archives? How to unsubscribe? http://www.appelsiini.net/keitai-l/ 
> 


Arnold P. Siboro (asiboro@maltech.jp)

Work is the greatest thing in the world, so save some for tomorrow.
Received on Sat May 28 15:54:34 2005