Home
2008:
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
2007:
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2006:
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2005:
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2004:
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2003:
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2002:
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2001:
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2000:
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December

(keitai-l) Re: QR codes

From: Michael Sydenham <msydenham_at_gmail.com>
Date: 04/19/06
Message-ID: <8b57722b0604182309q36da79fdt70fdb179f8593529_at_mail.gmail.com>
Gerhard
I said it was "CCD resolution and general QR block size" - note the latter
part. Also I think you'll find that generally the lens is not more expensive
compared to the CCD & necessary, accompanying processing electronics. Think
about it - we're not talking about multiple elements and groups nor
high-quality large diameter glass in a cameraphone ;-)

Michael.


On 4/19/06, Gerhard Fasol <fasol_at_eurotechnology.com> wrote:
>
> Since I got some off-list email on this subject:
>
> it's not the number of Megapixels that's critical -
> it's relatively easy and eye-catching for consumers
> to put a chip with a lot of Megapixels into a phone,
> what counts is the quality of the optical imaging,
> i.e. lens quality, focus, etc that's more expensive and
> difficult than the mexapixels
>
> Gerhard
Received on Wed Apr 19 09:09:07 2006