Home
2008:
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
2007:
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2006:
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2005:
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2004:
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2003:
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2002:
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2001:
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2000:
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December

(keitai-l) Re: Blip, blip, zap! 3G in Europe & roaming...

From: Benjamin Kowarsch <benjk_at_mac.com>
Date: 10/12/01
Message-Id: <46DC8D9A-BF10-11D5-A3BC-003065501888_at_mac.com>
On Friday, October 12, 2001, at 08:58 , mats_at_mobiledreams.com wrote:

> benjamin wrote:
>> That is quite interesting, given that PHS does not
>> have a roaming protocol nor any mode/means to
>> interoperate with GSM/MAP. Possible, NTT
>> have hacked something, but perhaps this follows the  
>> >rent-a-handset-and-roam model by which manual/static
>> call diversion is used to deliver calls
>
> I don't know the handset, but it could also be "2 handsets in one", 
> where the user has 2 subscriptions and chooses manually which "phone" 
> to use; at least that's how DoCoMo made (still make?) their PDC/PHS 
> phones.

The GSM/PHS handset developed by NTT and NEC switches automatically 
between the two modes. Thus if you are abroad i.e. in Europe it would 
switch into GSM mode. If you are in Japan it switches into PHS mode. 
This is similar to the way how PHS handsets switch between public and 
private network.

The problem with a roaming service is that a GSM network would want to 
send an authentication and roaming request to the home network's HLR 
using the GSM/MAP protocol.

Roaming between GSM and CDMA for example uses a gateway that translates 
such signalling from one standard to the other.

The difficulty with PHS is that PHS has not equivalent roaming 
international roaming functionality and therefore such a gateway cannot 
simply translate but it would also have to provide all the missing 
functions.

However, the ZEBRA roaming protocol has this functionality already 
built-in because it caters to situations where home networks do not 
support ZEBRA. This is called non-cooperative mode. There is also no 
need to deliver incoming calls via GSM/MAP because when the user signs 
in to a foreign network they are assigned a local account and a local 
phone number which is then sent back to the home network. If the home 
network wants to provide this service they can then use an ordinary call 
forwarding service to deliver incoming calls to their roaming customer.

The home network need not even be a mobile network. A fixed network can 
also participate. Thus, you could have a PHS cordless phone (without 
public PHS service) and if it was a GSM/PHS dual mode handset then you 
could roam via ZEBRA into a GSM network and receive incoming calls to 
your house or office on your mobile while roaming, or have voicemail 
forwarded to yourself.

PHS is widely adopted as a cordless standard in Asia. Latin America and 
the Middle East. Therefore, GSM/PHS roaming using this wireless/cordless 
mode could be quite interesting even outside of Japan.

rgds
BK


[ Need archives? How to unsubscribe? http://www.appelsiini.net/keitai-l/ ]
Received on Fri Oct 12 16:46:17 2001