Home
2008:
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
2007:
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2006:
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2005:
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2004:
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2003:
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2002:
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2001:
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2000:
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December

(keitai-l) Re: bitflipping out of the sandbox

From: Eric Hildum <EricHildum_at_earthlink.net>
Date: 05/19/03
Message-Id: <9CDBB808-8A16-11D7-AF3A-000393850E56_at_earthlink.net>
In this particular context, the physical access is the access you need 
to shine a light on the device with enough energy to flip bits in 
memory - that is, very close, on the order of centimeters. Note that 
the attack also assumes that you can position the light source and 
device at will.

As for the police example you use below, the answer is no in each case.


On Sunday, May 18, 2003, at 07:43  PM, Nick May wrote:

>
> keitai-l_at_appelsiini.net writes:
>> The attack does posit physical access to the device.
>
> I am bit confused by exactly how the term "physical access" is being
> used....
>
> If I am being chased by the police and they use a device to interfere 
> with
> my car's engine management system, does that constitute "physical 
> access"?
>
> If it is from 1metre away...
>
> If it is from 300 metres away...
>
> If it is from 3000 metres away...
>
>
> Nick
>
>
> This mail was sent to address EricHildum_at_earthlink.net
> Need archives? How to unsubscribe? http://www.appelsiini.net/keitai-l/
>
Received on Mon May 19 19:28:48 2003