Home
2008:
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
2007:
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2006:
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2005:
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2004:
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2003:
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2002:
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2001:
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2000:
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December

(keitai-l) Re: Content provider profits

From: Curt Sampson <cjs_at_cynic.net>
Date: 08/14/03
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.4.51.0308141047520.4594_at_angelic-vtfw.cvpn.cynic.net>
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, Philip Sidel wrote:

> Wells Fargo shut down their wireless site in the US, because of a
> lack of customer interest, while their online site remains best in
> class. Obviously, the increases in customer loyalty, satisfaction,
> etc... didn't offset the costs of development and maintenance, and the
> project got shut down...

I don't see this as obvious at all. I have *never* seen a business
that's been completely rational in all of its decisions, and especially
in IT, I've seen a lot of projects that have continued or not more more
for political than financial reasons.

So when looking at other companies' decisions about this, it's a good
idea to take them with a large grain of salt.

cjs
-- 
Curt Sampson  <cjs_at_cynic.net>   +81 90 7737 2974   http://www.NetBSD.org
    Don't you know, in this new Dark Age, we're all light.  --XTC
Received on Thu Aug 14 05:18:38 2003