Home
2008:
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
2007:
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2006:
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2005:
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2004:
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2003:
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2002:
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2001:
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2000:
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December

(keitai-l) Re: 2 quickies

From: Ben Hutchings <ben_at_decadentplace.org.uk>
Date: 12/05/03
Message-ID: <20031205113140.GD28286_at_decadentplace.org.uk>
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 07:29:57PM +0900, Curt Sampson wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, nick may wrote:
> 
> > 1) are the memory cards in Japanese phones formatted using FAT?
> > http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/34348.html
> 
> You betcha. Anything that uses an SD-card or a Memory Stick is almost
> certainly using FAT.
> 
> What I can't figure out is the $250,000 cap on royalties. MS is going
> to make no noticable amount of money on this. I guess they just want to
> knock out the little players, or something.

All the cited patents relate to VFAT, the extension to FAT that allows
for long filenames and three separate time-stamps and was implemented
in NT 3.5 and then Windows 95, and to any very similar scheme.  Many
(most?) devices that use FAT on flash cards still do not use this
extension.  The claim on flash cards themselves is totally bogus
because this extension is not necessary to create a blank FAT
filesystem.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
All the simple programs have been written, and all the good names taken.
Received on Fri Dec 5 13:34:06 2003