Home
2008:
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
2007:
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2006:
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2005:
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2004:
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2003:
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2002:
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2001:
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2000:
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December

(keitai-l) Re: google phone

From: Craig Kovatch <cromas_at_gmail.com>
Date: 01/30/07
Message-ID: <4254f2b00701300325i268eae31tec0e85995b9d57d9_at_mail.gmail.com>
While that might be true, Google has resisted DoJ subpoenas for large
amounts of information (and won in court) in the past, so at least
they have a better track record.

-c

On 1/30/07, Curt Sampson <cjs_at_cynic.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Joe Bowbeer wrote:
>
> > So far, Google has distinguished itself from Yahoo, MSN, and AOL by
> > refusing to provide search data - though in the end this may be
> > nothing more than good PR ("we tried and they didn't").
>
> But that's meaningless as far as e-mail goes, of course. It takes only
> a National Security Letter to get all the stored e-mail for any address
> from any ISP, and the letter explicitly forbids them from telling anyone
> that they've given out that information, or even received the letter.
>
> cjs
> --
> Curt Sampson  <cjs_at_cynic.net>   +81 90 7737 2974
>
> Mobile sites and software consulting: http://www.starling-software.com
>
> This mail was sent to address cromas_at_gmail.com
> Need archives? How to unsubscribe? http://www.appelsiini.net/keitai-l/
>
>
Received on Tue Jan 30 13:25:07 2007