(keitai-l) Re: Camera phones

From: Curt Sampson <cjs_at_cynic.net>
Date: 07/22/02
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.4.44.0207221319090.497-100000@angelic.cynic.net>
On Sat, 20 Jul 2002, M. David wrote:

> I see the ishot photo-server@docomo-camera.ne.jp service as an attempt by
> docomo to hit as many people with email as possible. By sending a URL vs.
> the actual picture, they are able to send it to non-shamail phones, as well
> as jphone, au, etc.

Huh? They do send the actual picture. It's sent as a JPEG
MIME attachement. The From: line looks like "090nnnnnnnn
<photo-server@docomo-camera.ne.jp>" (where the 'n's are the
phone number of the phone that sent it, I would guess.)

I still have the message and photo a campaign girl sent to me, so
I'd be happy to forward it to anybody on this list who wants a look
at it and contacts me privately.

> Docomo-hating Ken writes:
>
> >the reason why 'net -> DoCoMo i-shot messaging won't be allowed
> >is because when you receive an i-shot message, the sender is
> >the "photo-server@docomo-camera.ne.jp".  this opens a wide door
> >for spams, that you may have to set a filter to block the great
> >new DoCoMo service.

I'm not sure what you're talking about here. I was talking about this:
you put a .gif image up on a web page, put the URL in an e-mail you send
to a phone, and the phone will replace the URL with an icon when the
user sees it, and automatically download the image and display it within
the e-mail.

As far as the user's concerned, that's an attached photograph. It's
different to you, yeah, but I'm suspecting most users don't take quite
your interest in just what's going on underneath the hood, as it were.

cjs
-- 
Curt Sampson  <cjs_at_cynic.net>   +81 90 7737 2974   http://www.netbsd.org
    Don't you know, in this new Dark Age, we're all light.  --XTC
Received on Mon Jul 22 07:28:40 2002