The rendering of the page by the browser is quick enough
and very satisfactory.
Though the browser look and feel can be improved,
for the time being I am just happy when the message flashes
that it will cost me 2.1 yen instead of 4.32 yen for a certain page.
Manish Prabhune
www.imodeindia.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sergei Krupenin" <krupenin@epitrope.com>
To: <keitai-l@appelsiini.net>
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 3:17 AM
Subject: (keitai-l) Re: Hanpake?
> Manish, from your experience, how fast do hanpake or pakewari browsers
run?
>
> If anybody on the list is familiar with performance of J2ME-based
browsers,
> could you share your opinion of their speed?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sergei
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: keitai-l-bounce@appelsiini.net
> > [mailto:keitai-l-bounce@appelsiini.net]On Behalf Of Manish Prabhune
> > Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 2:53 AM
> > To: keitai-l@appelsiini.net
> > Subject: (keitai-l) Hanpake?
> >
> >
> > Hello all,
> > Have you guys seen the apps like "hanpake" and "pakewari"
> > These iApplis are browsers which display a CHTML page
> > The good part is that when a user makes a request to a page
> > it is sent to
> > hanpake site, which downloads the page, compresses it and then
> > sends it to the iAppli which renders it. The packet size reduction
> > brings down the browsing bill. Do see www.hanpake.com
> >
> > Manish Prabhune
> > www.imodeindia.com
> >
>
>
> [ Did you check the archives? http://www.appelsiini.net/keitai-l/ ]
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
[ Did you check the archives? http://www.appelsiini.net/keitai-l/ ]
Received on Fri Jul 13 03:45:07 2001