Of course, and obviously, WAP *is* meant to be a brand (ever seen a logo
made specifically for HTML/HTTP/TCP/IP?). It is just a brand for something
different than i-mode. Its like the difference between TetraPak and SnowMilk
(ok, forget about the casualties for a moment :-), TCP/IP is more in the PET
bottle category...or so
Regards!
Marc
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Turner [mailto:leap@gol.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 03, 2001 10:20 PM
> To: keitai-l@appelsiini.net
> Subject: (keitai-l) Re: Civilians at risk from unexploded WAP
> 2.0 specs
>
>
>
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/5/20782.html
> > > Undeterred by the failure of WAP in Europe - and as a
> brand it's
> > > so poorly regarded that it appears to have sunk in transit
> > > across the Atlantic
> > <snip>
>
> Ben Hutchings:
> <snippet>
> WAP is not meant to be a brand!
> </snippet>
>
> I'm sure the irony is not lost on the perennial defenders of
> i-mode. :-)
>
> -michael turner
> leap@gol.com
>
>
>
> [ Need archives? How to unsubscribe?
> http://www.appelsiini.net/keitai-l/ ]
>
[ Need archives? How to unsubscribe? http://www.appelsiini.net/keitai-l/ ]
Received on Sat Aug 4 11:10:34 2001