Marc Printz wrote: > > Of course, and obviously, WAP *is* meant to be a brand ... > It is just a brand for something > different than i-mode. > > > WAP is not meant to be a brand! > > </snippet> 1. The WAP-forum has very detailed regulations how its trademarks (including "W@P" etc) may and may not be used. The information is here: http://www.wapforum.com/wap_logos/trademarkusage.htm Seems to have aspects of a brand... 2. Regarding the never ending WAP vs. imode discussion see: http://www.eurotechnology.com/imode/faq-wap.html (this has been reviewed by the CEO of the WAP-Forum, and he said it's fair and accurate). Gerhard Fasol http://www.eurotechnology.com/ [ Need archives? How to unsubscribe? http://www.appelsiini.net/keitai-l/ ]Received on Sat Aug 4 15:10:34 2001