(keitai-l) Re: gimmick, but....

From: Dirk Rösler <dirkREMOVE_at_tkm.att.ne.jp>
Date: 02/19/03
Message-Id: <650E4C0C-43A9-11D7-817F-0030654492C6@tkm.att.ne.jp>
What you naive dreamers don't realise is that while everyone is 
becoming technically able to publish, that doesn't mean that everything 
will qualify for publishing. As the example of Mac & DTP: Yes, everyone 
can do graphics now, like everyone can do web pages, but most of the 
time DIY jobs are dull and ugly. Thus it's left to the pros. Besides 
WHY should I visit that site/view those photos etc, unless I know you 
or we share some niche interest and you are really relevant to it?

As for the radio (you misunderstood the point by the way: that if there 
is an event you could use the phone as on-site microphone and cover the 
event live - great newscasting, ha ha), like the above, yes, anyone can 
do radio, Internet radio (we're talking net stuff, aren't we). So why 
are so few people doing it? Well, because it is quite hard and often 
involves more than playing one song after another. The same goes for 
any publishing.

What do you mean by "drive the cost down"? Rubbish, it is more or less 
free already! So what? OK, so no expense except my time, I must be very 
profitable right? How exactly am I getting paid back? In fact the more 
visitors I get the higher my expenses (need more bandwidth, better 
hardware etc). I still don't get it, mate.

I have done photography for a few years professionally (not news 
though), and while a good amateur can technically produce an equal of 
not a better result than a pro, it doesn't mean that the pros run out 
of work, simply because it takes a lot of other skills to get results 
that sells (hint: it's not just the photograph, but the "services" 
around it).

One very reasonable way to approach this is "micro-publishing", is to 
provide means i.e. services to turn crap into gold, like Apple enables 
their customers to do. Put in your snaps, let's say relevant only to 
family and friends, not of interest to anybody else and with a few 
clicks produce a good looking web page, a DVD etc. Everyone's happy, 
who cares that the world doesn't want to see it. Now charge $1 for 
doing a really cool photo album. The world is waiting for such 
services. We need tools, not more raw materials!

But don't try telling me that picture editors are waiting for all the 
great pics from mobile snappers to come in, and we will get "better and 
more news".

I am sure there is a porn angle to all this, which probably works 
despite all that I have said above ;-)

Dirk

On Tuesday, Feb 18, 2003, at 17:55 Asia/Tokyo, Johan Bengtsson wrote:

>
>
> I agree with Erik, here's why:
>
> If you drive down the cost and trouble of instant publication of news,
> more people will be able to publish things that they think are
> newsworthy. Look at Bloggs for example. Now think mobile bloggs with
> photos.
>
> If you drive down the cost and trouble of publishing a photo you also
> drive down the number of viewers that you think needs to see it in 
> order
> for you to go through the trouble of doing it. Therefor, more photos
> from more events will be published since there indeed is more relevant
> news.=20
>
> And why hasn't this hit radio you ask. Well everyone can't start a 
> radio
> station but everyone can have a Blogg.
>
> /Johan
Received on Wed Feb 19 03:27:40 2003