Petri Ojala wrote:
> Although I had become very familiar with the Ericsson user interface, t=
he
> Nokia feels better for the most common tasks, less buttons to press and=
the
> "next step" is more obvious (correct) than with Ericsson. With so litt=
le
> use for MMS and T68's use of colours, I haven't even missed the colour
> screen.
Absolutely agree there, Nokia's interface is way ahead of Ericsson's.
I've got this Ericsson T39m since it's supported fro my Anoto pen, but
I've never made a call with it. Also tried the T68 which at least looks
better, but I still not like the userinterface.
Speaking of UI: the SonyEricsson interface is so "cool" that I gave up
playing with it already after a few minutes.
> I want my credit-card sized phone for voice/sms only and a separate all=
> bells and whistles phone ;-)
I guess I might sort of agree on that one: I've had my trusty Nokia 9110
every since it came out and I've yet to find something that suits me
better. Sure it's bulky, but a hip case solves that. The (no longer so
new) 9210 has a couple of nice features, but nothing significant - I
have one to switch to when the 9110 falls apart (no more repairs! :-( ),
but I won't switch until I have to as several of the nice free untility
programs are still not available for the 9210.
> PS. As far as I know, I'm not a Japanese girl
Nor am I... Rather the opposite. (Tall, blond, male, 30+)
/ Jonas
-- =
Jonas Petersson, X Media Solutions | mailto:Jonas.Petersson@xms.se
Box 3294, Holmbrogr=E4nd 1, S-600 03 Norrk=F6ping | http://www.xms.se/
Tel: +46 (0)11 244805 | Fax: +46 (0)11 244809
Received on Tue Aug 13 14:35:59 2002