personally - not that i think anyone care, but i'm bored at work - i think
the thickness of the phone and weight are the most important. the time the
phone is supposed to be tucked down in ur pockets - without making you look
pregnant nor increadibly horny - is longer that the time you actually spend
pushing its buttons. those old 208 were nice, u could even have them in your
back pocket and sit down. :)
i guess it's less of an issue for girls though as they have those hand bags
with them everywhere and a few extra grams won't be noticable among their
makeup sets, stun guns, tanpons, pirukura filled filosfax, tear gas patrons,
and god knows what else they carry around...
and as for batter life... if it has a 400h standby or 350h standby, or 10min
difference in calling time. who cares?
.tmk
> >I don't know about that. By that standard you'd also say that a 24 mm or
so
> >depth is a new criterion, since that's what most phones have been. Yet
> >Panasonic, at least, seems to have regained its senses, and the new P504i
> >is now 99g and 16.8 mm deep (a heck of a lot thinner than the P503iS's 27
> >mm).
>
> no Curt, length and thickness are far less important than width.
> maybe 49 mm is OK but not 50 mm. interesting it's so sensitive,
> and especially when you compete for small Japanese girls.
Received on Tue Aug 13 13:26:25 2002